"Reestablishing Religion" Religion, Authoritarianism, & Public Narratives -US, Part 4

"Reestablishing Religion" by Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman, and Nelson Tebbe.
University of Chicago Law Review January, 2025, 92:1, 1-84
Religion, Authoritarianism, and Public Narratives, Part 4
Monday, August 18, 2025 10:00 - 11:30 AM  CST (-6 UTC) - Online
‍
‍‍
In the last few years, a new pattern has emerged in the doctrine of religious freedom. Religion must be treated equally with respect to public funding and other forms of government support. But with respect to burdensome government regulations, believers are entitled to special treatment in the form of exemptions or accommodations. When these two lines of doctrine are brought together, they create a legal structure in which the state is required to give religious entities preferential treatment as compared to secular counterparts. So far, this emergent regime of structural preferentialism has favored mostly mainstream religious groups, which demand public funding while opposing a range of government regulations, including antidiscrimination and employment laws, education requirements, and public health rules. Reduced to a slogan, this is a constitutional doctrine of equal funding without equal regulation.

Schragger, Shwartzman, & Tebbe p. 3 Reestablishing Religion
Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman, and Nelson Tebbe will join us for a conversation regarding their article "Reestablishing Religion" and recent and pending cases before Supreme Court of the United States, for Religion, Authoritarianism, Public Narratives, part 4.

After discussing the article and the U.S. Supreme Court's recent pattern of decisions and addressing questions raised by those attending; we will take up among other topics: the current state of the teaching of law and religion; religious organizations and higher education; and the potential extensibility of "structural preferentialism" as an analytical concept or framework as a means of assessment and comparison among societies where majority religions function within legal systems that assert some form of secularism or small "l" liberal democracy.
‍
Additional details and resources to follow, please register via the form below.
‍
Suggested Reading
Reestablishing Religion is available for download
‍
SORAAAD is sponsored by Department of Gender, Religion, and Critical Studies, University of Regina and the Edward Bailey Centre for the Study of Implicit Religion.
‍

Register: SORAAAD Reestablishing Religion
August 18, 2025

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Thank you for registering. Please note that you are not registered until you receive the link.
‍
We welcome researchers from other disciplines and those interested in the topic at hand. Learn more about SORAAAD....

‍

Calendar

April 13, 2025
SORAAAD Book Club: Composing Violence, Religion, Authoritarianism and Public Narratives, Part 3
May 16-19, 2025
The 47th Implicit Religion Conference: Religion, Race and Sexuality
May 30, 2025
Implicit Religion US Conference: Extensive Effects, featuring a SORAAAD Workshop for students.
August 18, 2025
"Reestablishing Religion" Religion, Authoritarianism and Public Narratives - US, Part 4
September 7, 2025
SORAAAD Autumn Open House

Representation and the Analytical Study of Religion

SORAAAD’s 10th year of workshops, with the theme, "Representation and the Analytical Study of Religion" was interrupted by the COVID surge of early 2021, after talks by Richard Newton and Alana Vincent.

The workshop's events have been on hiatus and will, for now, continue online. SORAAAD will resume work on representation, through the focus of its series, Religion, Authoritarianism, and Public Narratives.

Attention to representation in research design, including what factors into how we understand religion and conceive of what we should study, were among the workshop’s originating concerns. In its most basic terms, representation is a means of characterizing and accounting for elements in “a sample” from which we generalize in order to characterize phenomena.

Representation conjures simultaneously the need to address the manufacture and designation of alterity and normativity (SORAAAD, 2012 PDF) , to cultivate a capacity to chart arrays of human expression and activity, to recognize and rectify voids, and to allow this work to change how we compare, explain, and conceptualize (Long, 1995; Moultrie, 2017, Compton et. al, 2017, Garland-Thomson, 2015)
...Continue reading.
‍

‍

Copyright © 2023 SORAAAD